Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    Well I am not an expert in reg ex.
    But I would set soming like
    (anything followed by 2 numbers with exact expression "-04-" followed by 4 numbers followed by anything) or (anything followed by 4 numbers with exact expression "-04-" followed by 2 numbers followed by anything)

    my tentative:
    [0-9][0-9]-04-[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]|[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-04-[0-9][0-9]

    Not sure this makes sence.
    Note: this is my first tentative for a regex expressoion ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

    Br
    Jf

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    I remember that threat… I even wonder if I was not originator…
    I still believe that option to import DB structures or rules is great…
    I understand that you now are able to import/export structures which are replacing the current structure…adding a structure is not possible..correct ?

    Would it be a great work ?

    Other option describe on the wiki some regex rules for these regular resquests ๐Ÿ™‚

    BR,
    Jf

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    I will take of the french one… Just let me some time to do it ๐Ÿ™‚

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    I totally agree with MRDNA

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    I was thinking at some nice extra feature for the autotagging…

    I useally place a date in the files for the letters or document I work on.
    Parsing the filename and tagging the files based on the parsing could make sense ?

    Any other thoughts on this ?

    Br
    Jf

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    This seems indeed very interresting as I have the same issue at work…
    Being able to use Tabble without installation privilege would be great… I even had a weird dream this night…
    An online version of Tabble… Let me explain…
    As google is organizing the online information… Tabble would be THE tool to organize off-line information…

    I had a dream…. I dreamed that I had a tool that could organize all my off-line information (read all the info I store on my disks) of the different computers I work on (my work laptop and all network drives, my home desktop, my home laptop, etc…)

    I use a small program which I do not need administrator rights to use (or.. the program is webbased ?)
    The information is stored on the web.. so I can access it from anywhere. When I log in the program detects on which PC I am located and I can search the files that have been tagged from this PC.
    If I search a file which is on another PC it tells me this…
    I will find all the information back at anytime and anywhere… and if i do not have direct access to the information I know where it is located…

    Finally I will get a large fee from Yellow blue soft when it will bought over by Google ๐Ÿ™‚

    Any comments are welcome…

    Jf

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    I would also add the possibility to remove the traditional menu somewhere in the options, this would allow the hard-core users to have this traditional menu ๐Ÿ˜€

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    I see we are pretty aligned on what to do ๐Ÿ™‚

    Jf

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36
    in reply to: MultiUser Support #1096

    Will do ๐Ÿ™‚

    I am pretty excited about that release as I think this will very useful in a business environment where a lot of info is stored but nobody i able to dig it back.

    I am willing to test any alpha version on my home network if this might help…

    Br,
    Jf

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    Well, this makes sense… I am looking forward for the beta version ๐Ÿ™‚

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36
    in reply to: MultiUser Support #1088

    Hello,

    Here is my vision of Multi-User support… this vision is typically in business environment where a lot of persons put a lot of information on network drive but nobody knows what info is where ๐Ÿ™‚

    You could install tables on the PC.
    The database is located in a central place (server)
    All tables programs points to that database
    When placing something on the server you are supposed to tag it correctly.

    This will allow everybody to find back the info based on the tags…but….this brings a few issues as well:
    -the filelocation must be more robust (as the share does not necessary have the same network-drive name)
    -there might be issues on security:
    –I can imagine that all info should not be available for everybody)
    –I can imagine that the management of table should be centralized to avoid everybody adding tables
    –I can imagine that it might be necessary to have a read only access (just to find documents back but not to add files in tables)

    Just a few thoughts….

    Any other ideas around ?

    Br
    Jfw

    Jfw
    Participant
    Post count: 36

    Well the auto-tagging feature might help… but I am still convinced that keeping track of copies might be usefull (maybe as an option ?)

    For the last one:
    I see tables auto-detects the drives (for ex c: and d:). Clicking on the drives allows me to browse the content.
    I tag a file "a.xls" on the C: drive as "Invoice" and if I tag a file "b.xls" on the drive as "Invoice" as well.

    If I want to retrive this file I can use tables and look for the "invoice" tag. I will then have "c:a.xls" and "d:b.xls"
    To have only the a.xls file I tried to combine "Invoice" and the "c:-drive" tag. I then surprisingly got "no files fiound" message…

    Hope this explanation makes more sense

    Br,
    Jf

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)