AndreaKeymasterMarch 5, 2010 at 3:09 amPost count: 880
=== Open discussion: please speak your mind ===
Question: should we name the next release 2.0?
Reasons: we feel that we’re ready to make some real hype and we’re getting ready to write to 100 big blogs, launching a Free version (until 1000 files… same as the current beta) at the same.
(Also, to our customers who bought the version 1.x, we’d extend the support until the version 2.5…)
What do you think? Should we go for 2.0 or stick to 1.5?
Any opinion is veeeery welcome!
nefyceeParticipantMarch 5, 2010 at 3:54 pmPost count: 143
I think the chancelog would not be very impressive.
From 1.4.9 to 2 would not a lot of optical changes.
0.x.00 (stable versions/minor changes)
x.0.00 (major improvements like new GUI, DB structures, etc.)
A new marketing isn’t really a major upgrade 😛
AndreaKeymasterMarch 5, 2010 at 5:02 pmPost count: 880
Yes you’re right, but our goal now is not to be coherent and have a meaningful version naming, but:
– to make sure that as many blog as possible write about us
– that people come to the website and install the software
All the rest is not important right now.
Think of it this way: if you knew nothing about Tabbles, what would you be more interested in?
mrdnaParticipantMarch 5, 2010 at 7:39 pmPost count: 220
"Andrea" wrote: Think of it this way: if you knew nothing about Tabbles, what would you be more interested in?
An integrated link/unlink/rename panel? But that’s just me… 😉
Not sure about the 2.0, it is quite a jump. 1.5 for the freemium ability certainly, but I’d figure a full 2.0 for when (if?) the graphical desktop gets usable again.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.